Chicago Attorneys Answer Joint and Sole Allocation FAQs
A: Joint and sole allocation usually relate to significant decision-making for the child as opposed to the physical residence of the child. Joint legal allocation in Chicago requires that parents work together, make decisions together, and communicate effectively. The primary decisions at issue relate to the education, healthcare, extracurricular activities, and religion of any minor children. Whether a parent has sole allocation or joint allocation relating to decision-making, it will not affect the parenting time schedule for the other parent.
A: If parents cannot agree on an allocation arrangement, and do not come forward with information indicating otherwise, Illinois courts assume that each parent is fit and acts in the best interest of the child or children. It is always best to come to an allocation arrangement with your former spouse so as to avoid a potentially unfavorable outcome.
A: The court determines what allocation arrangement is in the child's best interest (in the absence of a parental agreement) using the following factors:
- The wishes of the child's parent or parents;
- The wishes of the child;
- The needs of the child;
- The child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community;
- The mental and physical health of everyone involved;
- The ability of the parents to cooperate to make decisions, or the level of conflict between the parties that may affect their ability to share decision-making;
- The level of each parent’s participation in past significant decision-making with respect to the child;
- Any prior agreement or course of conduct between the parents relating to decision-making with respect to the child;
- The distance between the parents’ residences, the cost and difficulty of transporting the child, each parent’s and the child’s daily schedules, and the ability of the parents to cooperate in the arrangement;
- Any physical violence, or threat of, by the parent directed against the child;
- The occurrence of abuse against the child or other member of the child’s household;
- The willingness of each parent to maintain a close relationship between the child and other parent;
- Whether one of the parents is a sex offender; and
- If a parent is in the U.S. Armed Forces, the terms of their military family-care plan.
A: No, it does not. As long as both parents are fulfilling the joint allocation agreement and are working together when making decisions about their child, the child may live full-time with one parent, if that is the residential arrangement both parents agree to.
A: If you and your former spouse are comfortable discussing important decisions concerning your child and can come to an agreement, then joint allocation may be the best option for your family. However, if you are not comfortable working with your former spouse it may be best that one of you have sole allocation of decision-making for issues concerning healthcare, education, extracurricular activities, and religion of the child or children.
A: Deciding who will be the decision-maker for your child or children is a very important decision. The involvement of both parents is always preferred, but not always possible. Speaking with an Illinois family law attorney can help you and your former spouse make the right decision. Our dedicated attorneys at Nottage and Ward, LLP, will work with you and your former spouse openly and professionally to determine the best allocation arrangement for your family. Call us for an initial consultation at (312) 332-2915.
- The Distinction between Joint Allocation and Sole Allocation in Illinois
- What Factors Are Considered in an Illinois Child Allocation Case?
- Being a Part-Time Parent in a Full-Time Way
To learn more, click here.
To learn more, click here.
Leslie has been the strongest representation I could ask for
Leslie has been the strongest representation I could ask for in a very complicated, emotional matter. She has continuously looked out for my best interest and the best interest of my son. She is always prompt in getting back to me and in keeping me well informed about my case.
Read More Client Reviews